Unclog pipeline for new medicines
Improving the way research is done: the UK Reproducibility Network
Major medical journals don’t follow their own rules for reporting results from clinical trials
Statistical-significance thinking is not just a bad way to publish, it’s also a bad way to think
Duke University’s huge misconduct fine is a reminder to reward rigour
The Importance of Predefined Rules and Prespecified Statistical Analyses
Microbes May Take Some of the Blame for the Reproducibility Crisis
The replication crisis is good for science
Scientists rise up against statistical significance
It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance
Retiring statistical significance would give bias a free pass
Raise the bar rather than retire significance
Retire significance, but still test hypotheses
Statisticians’ Call To Arms: Reject Significance And Embrace Uncertainty!
800 scientists say it’s time to abandon “statistical significance”
The Guardian view on statistics in sciences: gaming the (un)known
Qualität medizinischer Studien – So will Berlin für saubere Forschung sorgen (in German)
Statistical Inference in the 21st Century: A World Beyond p<0.05
“Retire Statistical Significance”: The discussion
Dump ‘Statistical Significance,’ Then Teach Scientists Statistics
Innovator Story: Wrestling the Octopus
Rein in the four horsemen of irreproducibility
CMU Partners with Protocols.io to Enable Scientific Practices Sharing
Minor Tweak, Major Impact Episode 02: Dr. Glenn Begley, CEO of BioCurate
FAIRsharing – where to look when you don’t know where to look
0 Comments
Leave A Comment